Compliance with functional safety is different from other AQs such as CMMI, etc. This is a very specific area of operation and requires certain skills and qualifications. In addition, achieving functional safety in automotive software development is evidence-based. These are some of the reasons why safety planning is becoming an essential part of ISO 26262 compliance. The following table makes the interface agreement more understandable: DELV development, RTE and BSW integration, application layer development, tool configuration, and code creation As an interface is implemented between entities during development, the table is called a development interface agreement (DIA). 그렇지 않다. 사실 저 위에 명시된 In context development 인경우. For example, concept development and hardware design may not be part of the project. That is why we need to define the areas that fall within the scope of each project. In order to achieve functional safety in automotive software development, all parties involved must work towards this common goal. The interaction between project team members should be defined in the activity sheet for safety planning.
These work products act as necessary evidence to demonstrate that safety planning for automotive product development has been carried out in accordance with ISO 26262 guidelines. Anyone who has been part of an automotive project idea and product development understands how critical project planning is. The objective of Section 5 Interfaces in Distributed Developments is to describe procedures and assign related responsibilities for elements and elements in distributed developments. It ensures that functional safety within the supply chain, which participates in the entire safety lifecycle, is ensured and maintained and includes six work products. A development interface agreement, heard and mutually agreed, provides both the customer and the supplier with the information necessary to properly plan and execute the activities and work products that lead to a functionally safe finished product. As simple as it may seem, there seems to be a big difference in how these agreements are presented and executed, which could possibly cause problems or concerns later in the project. . . .